« March 2008 | Main | May 2008 »

April 29, 2008

Road to the L.A. Screenings: Take Five With Saralo MacGregor

By Leah Hochbaum Rosner

With the L.A. Screenings just weeks away, TV executives across the world are preparing to travel to sunny California for a Screenings that, in the aftermath of the Writers Guild of America strike in the U.S., has the potential to be quite a different affair from what people remember. Saralo MacGregor, executive vice president, Worldwide Distribution, for U.K.-based Fireworks International, a division of ContentFilm plc, spoke with VideoAge about why indies might fare particularly well this year, what territories the company intends to focus on, and why, despite the fact that MIP-TV and MIPCOM are wonderful markets, there’s nothing quite like the Los Angeles Screenings.

VideoAge International: What product is Fireworks bringing to the L.A. Screenings?

Saralo MacGregor: [We’re] offering over 3,000 hours of programming. New releases at the L.A. Screenings include drama series The Border and heartwarming family drama series Heartland, both of which have been renewed for second seasons. In addition, we will be showcasing brand new U.S. comedy series The Assistants from the Tom Lynch Co.

VAI: Do you think this year’s Screenings will be particularly good for the indies?

SM: Given the reduced flow of product available due to the writers strike, the indies will have an increased presence at the L.A. Screenings. The after-effects of the strike afford us a great platform to showcase our new series.

VAI: What is Fireworks going to do in order to attract buyers?

SM: Fireworks has assumed a leading position in the international program distribution field on the strength of the worldwide success of its award-winning programming. It is on the back of this that we are able to offer our buyers the very best in quality programming — programming that can be trusted to perform well in their schedules. Our rapidly expanding catalogue offers programming suitable for every type of channel.

VAI: What are your expectations for the Screenings?

SM: With between 1,300 and 1,500 international buyers scheduled to visit the Screenings this year, the market provides a tremendously valuable opportunity to showcase our new programming. The market also offers us the opportunity to follow up on meetings held at MIP-TV and to meet with our buyers face to face.

VAI: Are you focusing on any particular territories?

SM: We appreciate the opportunity to meet with all of our international buyers. But traditionally, more Latin American buyers attend this market than MIP-TV or MIPCOM, so attendance is vital.

April 23, 2008

Road to the L.A. Screenings: Take Five with Gene George

By Leah Hochbaum Rosner

Gene George only joined Burbank, California-based Starz Media as executive vice president, Worldwide Distribution, in January, but he already feels as if he’s been there for years. George, who previously served as president of Regent Worldwide, is participating in the L.A. Screenings in May to promote Starz’s new and existing product, as well as to see whether or not the shorter Screenings — which came about as a result of the Writers Guild of America strike in the U.S. — will be repeated next year or will fall by the wayside when things get back to business as usual. George spoke with VideoAge about Starz’s plans for the Screenings, as well as why the independents might benefit from the fact that buyers will have more time on their hands.

VideoAge International: What product is Starz bringing to the L.A. Screenings?

Gene George: We’re bringing a couple of half-hour semi-scripted comedy shows that were produced for the Starz channel in the U.S. We currently have 13 half-hours of Head Case and we greenlit another 10 episodes at MIP-TV, so we’ll have 23 half-hours. We also have eight half-hours of Hollywood Residential. Part of our initiative with our channels in the U.S. is to move into some original programming. The Starz and Encore channels had been movie destinations. But now we’re methodically and carefully exploring original programming. We’ve also partnered with Lionsgate for a series based on the movie Crash, which should debut this fall. Starz has all the U.S. rights. Lionsgate has all international rights.

VAI: How different will the Screenings be this year with fewer pilots commissioned by the networks?

GG: The Screenings will definitely be a little shortened. There’s not as much product available as there is in normal seasons. But I spoke to a number of buyers at MIP and their impression is that this could be a positive thing for a company like ours.

VAI: Do you think most indies will benefit similarly? Will this be a particularly good year for independent companies?

GG: Well, you still have to have the right product. But the Screenings will definitely not be as focused on studio product as they usually are.

VAI: Will these shortened Screenings with fewer pilots become the norm or will we go back to the way things were before?

GG: We’ll go back to the way things were before. But it really depends on how this season works out. It’s really still too early to tell.

VAI: What are your expectations for this year’s Screenings?

GG: I’m new here at Starz, so I’m eager to get time with broadcasters so they can better understand our business plan going forward. We had a great MIP and we’re looking to keep that momentum going. I’m looking forward to spending time with broadcasters in an environment that is less stressed than a MIP or a MIPCOM.

April 15, 2008

The Good Ol’ Days: Russian Jews and the TV Trades

By Dom Serafini

When I used to work at Television/Radio Age, magazine publisher, Sol J. Paul, made sure that all of us editorial people would always have a copy of the magazine on hand. He even coined a slogan: “Make believe it’s an American Express card!,” a take on that famous company promo: “Don’t leave home without it!”

Nowadays, at various TV trade shows, such as this one in Cannes, we see a great number of publishers doing just that –– with wheelies in tow full of their publications. There are several reasons for this. First, they’re usually heavy and therefore carts are needed to carry them around. They also want to make sure that clients and potential clients see their issues, especially if there aren’t enough copies around.

My old boss, however, didn’t want us to carry around the publication to hand it out, but to upset the competition –– above all Sol Taishoff, founder of Broadcasting (now Broadcasting and Cable). There was no friction with Syd Silverman, the son of Variety founder, Sime. Paul did not mind The Hollywood Reporter, either. Actually, he was fond of and amused by publisher Tichi Wilkerson, wife of the paper’s founder, Billy.

Paul had an anecdote for all of them, except Taishoff. Actually, he would never talk about Sol, but Taishoff would talk about Paul very energetically with me –– despite his age and having lost one lung to cancer. Every time we would meet, he’d blast Paul, calling him names and asking me why on earth (actually, he used expletives) I’d work for someone like Sol Paul. But, he’d never explain what brought up such feelings of enmity.

It was known that when the two crossed paths on the street, one of them would walk away, so as not to meet face-to-face. Many a time I tried to bring the conversation around to the subject of this animosity, but Sol Paul would never take the bait and, it certainly couldn’t be mentioned that I was actually talking to Taishoff. He’d have seen it as the highest form of treason!

There was something there that couldn’t be revealed. Sol Paul would trust me with his American Express card, but not with the reasons for the feud. Speaking of the Amex card, I remember being considered something of a “weirdo” in the office because, during business trips, I would return the unspent portion of my petty cash. Naturally, I’d also walk around the office in my slippers and bring my lunch in a brown bag. Plus, I’d never sign in or out. Clearly I was a strange creature in the eyes of my co-editors. What made me something of a “cult” figure, however, was the fact that I could operate the telex machine –– one of those ITT units on a stand that, every time it was in use, would vibrate so hard that at times it would literally be jumping around the room! And that was another sore point with my co-workers. All were much older and had seniority and yet, I had an office (albeit windowless), while they were seated at desks out on the corridor. Plus, my job was to write some of Paul’s editorials. He would dictate the topics and I’d come up with content, not because he wasn’t a good writer, but simply because he was constantly on the phone dispensing advice, especially to radio and TV station managers and owners. Even though today there is hardly any historical accounts of his career, Paul’s life was just as colorful as those he used to gossip about. Reportedly, he left his right-hand person, Lee Sheridan, virtually at the altar to wed his secretary in his second marriage. Lee never married and remained loyal to Paul until his death in 1992. And every time she visited me, she always had fond memories of Paul.

As a TV history buff, it amazes me that the television industry in America was completely developed by Russian Jews –– some originating from the same village –– who were fiercely antagonist with each other. Just to mention a few: RCA-NBC’s David Sarnoff, CBS’ Bill Paley and ABC’s Leonard Goldenson. There were also Vladimir Zworykin, the putative father of modern television –– and the creator of color television, Peter Goldmark, both of whom I was able to interview before they passed away. Plus, Taishoff and Paul. The latter had shortened his original long Russian surname. But while Sarnoff, Zworykin, Goldmark and Taishoff were actually born in Russia, the others were American-born of Russian descent.

All the key players in the TV trade publication business started at about the same time: Sol Taishoff founded Broadcasting in 1931 at the age of 27. Sol Paul, who was 10 years younger, joined it in 1941, first as a writer, later becoming its advertising sales manager. The Hollywood Reporter started in 1930, and Variety launched in 1933.

Sol Paul started the biweekly Television Age (which later became Television/Radio Age) in 1953, reportedly with the help of Sarnoff’s RCA. This angered Sol Taishoff to no end. He would stop talking to people who left his magazine to go to work in unrelated fields, so one could imagine his fury against someone like Paul, who became a competitor. In a freakish turn of events, I left Paul to start VideoAge in 1981 with the support of various companies. However, in the beginning, he was not upset with me because he refused a partnership and because he was convinced that I wouldn’t make it.

After Sol Taishoff’s death, his son Larry sold the publication, in 1986, to Times Mirror for $75 million. Five years later, the group sold it to Reed Business (which today also owns Variety) for $32 million.

Just about the same time, Sol Paul refused an offer of $15 million for his biweekly, thinking that his publication was worth just as much as Broadcasting. A few years later, Paul engaged in negotiations with Variety’s executives who, reportedly, offered just $5 million for his magazine. But the due diligence process dragged on for a long time and the publication collapsed in 1989. One could say under its own weight, since Paul was fond of publishing 200-plus page issues that, despite readers’ willingness to read because of the interesting nature of the articles, they rarely could find the time to actually read or muster the strength to pick the issues up at markets. Luckily, in those days there weren’t any wheelies and that, perhaps, could explain why Paul did not ask us to distribute them. But he was certainly ahead of his time!

April 07, 2008

Take Five With David Ellender

By Leah Hochbaum Rosner

Prior to MIP-TV, U.K.-based FremantleMedia Enterprises (FME) scored a big get — securing the rights to Harpo Productions’ Oprah’s Big Give for international distribution. (FremantleMedia also represents the show’s format rights at the market.) Oprah’s Big Give is a unique reality show in which contestants travel the U.S. for eight weeks attempting to out-give each other and change people’s lives for the better. David Ellender, CEO of FremantleMedia Enterprises spoke to VideoAge about Oprah Winfrey’s worldwide appeal and why MIP-TV continues to be a must-attend market for the British firm.

VideoAge International: What makes Oprah’s Big Give (and Oprah herself) so appealing to an international audience?

David Ellender: Oprah’s positive message and strong history of giving are universally appealing themes and something that any network would be proud to have on the airwaves. She is an international icon. Oprah’s Big Give is also a totally unique concept — a competition to give rather than to get!

VAI: How did FremantleMedia manage to snag such a huge TV icon?

DE: The Harpo team recognized our strengths as the best people to spread Big Give worldwide because of our expertise in building global brands and our ability to successfully exploit both U.S. versions and localized formats on a territory-by-territory basis. They’ve also seen that we have strong partnerships and work effectively alongside other icons such as Jamie Oliver, Martha Stewart and Emeril Lagasse, amongst others.

VAI: Will your big launch of the program be at MIP?

DE: It’s a key show for us. We have such a great brand to work with. You’ll see Oprah’s Big Give in the Palais, read about it in the press and experience it at our beachfront stand. Sadly, though, Oprah’s demanding schedule would not allow her the travel time to be here with us.

VAI: What other plans does FremantleMedia have for MIP-TV?

DE: As always, we’re launching a number of fantastic new titles stretching across the drama, comedy, factual and entertainment genres. Key new shows include Australian drama Satisfaction, the recently commissioned second season of which is now available for pre-sale. We also have returning series such as The Martha Stewart Show, The Janice Dickinson Modeling Agency, Celebrity Apprentice, Anthony Bourdain’s No Reservations and Iconoclasts. Additionally, we’re offering new spins on reality programming, including She’s Got the Look, the search for the next new over-35 face in the fashion industry, and DEA, a show that invites viewers to go undercover with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency.

VAI: What do you expect MIP will be like for Fremantle this year?

DE: We are in love with Oprah’s Big Give! It’s infectious TV and it means so much to be a part of something new and important. With our biggest slate yet, this is going to be a very busy but very exciting market for us.

April 01, 2008

Road to MIP-TV: Take Five with Marion Edwards

By Leah Hochbaum Rosner

The 45th annual MIP-TV conference, which will be held next week in Cannes, France, is almost underway. As part of VideoAge’s continuing series of pre-MIP-TV Q&As, we spoke with Marion Edwards, president, International Television at Twentieth Century Fox, to find out why MIP-TV remains an important date on the studios’ schedules, how Twentieth Century Fox is bouncing back from the Writers Guild of America strike and, most importantly, why she’s not yet ready to give up on the pilot system.

VideoAge International: What are your plans for MIP-TV this year?

Marion Edwards: Usually, our focus at MIP is three-pronged. First, we bring our midseason shows, which we’re doing this year with such series as New Amsterdam and Unhitched. We’ll be watching to see if any of them get renewed. Second, we bring our new cable series. But because of the strike this year, we don’t have any information as far as they go. And third, we start gearing up for the L.A. Screenings, which could be fairly complicated this year, also as a result of the strike.

VAI: So it’s safe to say the strike is still affecting Twentieth Century Fox?

ME: It seems like we’re having two development seasons this year. At Twentieth Century Fox, a number of pilots were shot prior to the strike. A lot of the pilots that are getting picked up now, there’s no real time to cast and shoot them in a typical time frame. I foresee more midseason shows. Right now, everyone’s focusing on how to get their shows back on track. There is a huge argument to be made that pilot season is very wasteful. I think everyone’s struggling to see what might replace the system. But TV is a try and fail medium. It’s getting tougher and tougher to hold people’s attention.

VAI: What else are you focusing on at MIP?

ME: We’re focused on formats, in addition to our unscripted series. This year, everyone’s looking into their libraries for inspiration. Shooting a local version of say, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, might be difficult. But Prison Break and Dharma and Greg might be a lot easier. So we’re exploring that.

VAI: Why does MIP-TV continue to be such an important market for you to attend?

ME: We attend because all of our clients are there, in addition to the other studios. It’s important for us to be there representing our products, and to be able to sit down with people and discuss those products. We are, in the end, a sales business, and to be able to be in direct contact with the people we’re licensing to is really important.

VAI: Do you ever get to attend any of the many sessions offered by Reed Midem at MIP-TV?

ME: No. The reality is that those sessions are great primer for issues, but they’re not as in-depth as I’d like for them to be. It’s kind of like taking “Intro to Digital Delivery” when what I really want is to be able to ask one-on-one questions of panel members. The sessions usually offer a good overview, but there’s no in-depth analysis.


Hosting by Yahoo!